[Reprint] Pedagogical Lessons from Students’ Participation in Web 2.0

Authors

Keywords:

learning engagement, online participation, TESOL, Web 2.0

Abstract

Responses of Vietnamese undergraduate students majoring in English to the integration of a Moodle site during an upper intermediate macro-skill course highlight differences in learner autonomy and expectations. Students’ general attitudes towards, and participation in, this online Web 2.0 environment provide the basis for the research reported in this paper. Qualitative data from individual interviews ranged from neutral to very positive. The data also identified three patterns of online participation: task-oriented, content-oriented and community-oriented. These patterns reflect a transition in the local students’ learning expectations and behaviours towards controlling their learning processes and socialising activities in their formal learning. The paper concludes with a number of pedagogical suggestions for the process of technology integration in education in the local context. These are aimed at better engagement of students in the process of personalising online learning environments to suit their needs.

Author Biographies

  • Tin T. Dang, La Trobe University

    Tin T. Dang is an ESL teacher/lecturer in Vietnam. After returning from the University of Queensland in mid-2005, he started to work as an academic manager in SEAMEO Regional Training Center and was involved in different projects and initiatives regarding ICT in education. He is currently working towards his PhD at La Trobe University. His research interests include learner autonomy and CALL.

  • Margaret Robertson, La Trobe University

    Margaret Robertson is Professor in Education and Associate Dean, Research in the Faculty of Education at La Trobe University. She is widely published in books and journals, with extensive international expertise in teaching and research project management. Her career-long interests in quality learning environments for young people are linked with an enduring passion for geographical and sustainable education and knowing more about visual and spatial literacies.

References

Ayres, R. (2002). Learner attitudes towards the use of CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(3), 241 - 249.

Bailey, C. J., & Card, K. A. (2009). Effective pedagogical practices for online teaching: Perception of experienced instructors. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3-4), 152-155.

Beauvois, M. H. (1992). Computer assisted classroom discussion in the classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), 525-534.

Belz, J. A. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration [Electronic Version]. Language Learning & Technology, 7, 68-99. Retrieved 10-08-2010, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/belz/default.html

Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 191-205.

Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Boston, Mass.: Pearson A & B.

Boulton, A., Chateau, A., Pereiro, M., & Azzam-Hannachi, R. (2008). Learning to learn languages with ICT - But how? [Electronic Version]. CALL-EJ Online, 9. Retrieved 08-08-2009, from http://callej.org/journal/9-2/boulton.html

Brew, L. S. (2008). The role of student feedback in evaluating and revising a blended learning course. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 98-105.

Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. New York: Longman Inc.

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.

Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. Washington DC: Washington Center News.

Chou, P.-N., & Chen, W.-F. (2010). Chinese Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning in Western Discussion Boards: A Cultural Perspective. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 7(2).

Dang, T. T. (2010). Learner Autonomy in EFL Studies in Vietnam: A Discussion from Socio-cultural Perspective. English Language Teaching, 3(2), 3-9.

Dang, T. T., & Robertson, M. (2010). E-behaviors and E-community Formation: An Investigation on Vietnamese EFL Students. Asian EFL Journal. Professional Teaching Articles, 46, 4-27.

Dixon, R., Dixon, K., & Siragusa, L. (2007). Individuals' perceptions of online environments: What adult learners are telling us. In R. J. Atkinson, C. McBeath, S. K. A. Soong & C. Cheers (Eds.), ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings Ascilite Singapore 2007 (pp. 207-218). Centre for Educational Development, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 2-5 December.

Doan, D. H. (2005). Moral education or political education in the Vietnamese educational system? Journal of Moral Education, 34(4), 451-463.

Farmer, J. (2006). Blogging to Basics: How Blogs are Bringing Online Education Back from the Brink. In A. Bruns & J. Jacobs (Eds.), Uses of blogs (pp. 91-104). New York: Peter Lang.

Guardado, M., & Shi, L. (2007). ESL students' experiences of online peer feedback. Computers and Composition, 24(4), 443-461.

Hanna, B., & de Nooy, J. (2003). A funny thing happened on the way to the forum: Electronic discussion and foreign language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 7(1), 71-85.

Hubbard, P. (2005). A review of subject characteristics in CALL research. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(5), 351 - 368.

Jung, U. (2005). CALL: Past, present and future - A bibliometric approach. ReCALL, 17(1), 4-17.

Kanniah, A., & Krish, P. (2010). Collaborative learning skills used in Weblog [Electronic Version]. CALL-EJ Online, 11. Retrieved 07-10-2010, from http://callej.org/journal/11-2/kanniah_krish.html

Kent, N., & Facerw, K. (2004). Different worlds? A comparison of young people’s home and school ICT use. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 440-455.

Kern, R. G. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 457-476.

Kessler, G., & Bikowski, D. (2010). Developing collaborative autonomous learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 41 - 58.

Le, H. P. (2008, 12-November). Su bao cap da troi buoc giao vien [The system of subsidies has tied up its teachers]. Tuoi Tre. Retrieved 13-11-2008, from http://www.tuoitre.com.vn/Tianyon/Index.aspx?ArticleID=287486&ChannelID=13

Leach, J., & Moon, B. (2008). The Power of Pedagogy. London: SAGE.

Lee, M.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2005). Exploring high school students' and teachers' preferences toward the constructivist Internet-based learning environments in Taiwan. Educational Studies, 31(2), 149 - 167.

Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Liontas, J. I. (2002). CALLMedia digital technology: Whither in the new millennium? CALICO Journal, 19(2), 315-330.

Lomicka, L., & Lord, G. (2009a). Introduction to social networking, collaboration, and web 2.0 tools. In L. Lomicka & G. Lord (Eds.), The next generation: social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 1-11). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.

Lomicka, L., & Lord, G. (2009b). The next generation: social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning. San Marcos, TX: CALICO.

Malikowski, S. R., Thompson, M. E., & Theis, J. G. (2006). External factors associated with adopting a CMS in resident college courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 163-174.

Manochehr, N.-N. (2006). The influence of learning styles on learners in e-learning environments: An empirical study [Electronic Version]. Computers in Higher Education Economics Review, 18, 10-14. Retrieved 10-8-2008, from http://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/cheer/ch18/manochehr.pdf

Merriam, S. B., Caffarella, R. S., & Baumgartner, L. (2007). Learning in adulthood: a comprehensive guide (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Miniwatts Marketing Group. (2010). Asia internet usage and population [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 04-10-2010, from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats3.htm#asia

Morris, L. V., & Finnegan, C. L. (2008-2009). Best Practices in Predicting and Encouraging Student Persistence and Achievement Online. Journal of College Student Retention, 10(1), 55-64.

Oliver, R. (2001). Developing e-learning environments that support knowledge construction in higher education. In S. Stoney & J. Burn (Eds.), Working for excellence in the e-conomy (pp. 407-416). Churchlands: Australia: We-B Centre.

O'Malley, J., & McCraw, H. (1999). Students’ perceptions of distance learning, online learning and the traditional classroom [Electronic Version]. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(4), from http://www.westga.edu/%7Edistance/omalley24.html

Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2005). Collaborating online: learning together in community (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Pan, C., Gunter, G., Sivo, S., & Cornall, R. (2005). End-user acceptance of a learning management system in two hybrid large-sized introductory undergraduate course: a case study. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 33(4), 355 - 365.

Payne, J. S., & Whitney, P. J. (2002). Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal, 20(1), 7-32.

Pham, H. H. (1999). The key socio-cultural factors that work against success in tertiary English language training programs in Vietnam. Paper presented at the The fourth International Conference on language and Development. Retrieved 5-10-2008, from http://www.languages.ait.ac.th/hanoi_proceedings/hiep.html

Pham, H. T., & Ngo, A. D. (2008). Phat trien nguon nhan luc cong nghiep o Viet Nam trong giai doan moi cua cong nghiep hoa [Human development for Vietnam industry in the period of industrialization] [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 10-10-2008, from http://www.vdf.org.vn/Doc/2008/VDFConf_WIPHoangVie.pdf

Purushotma, R. (2005). Commentary: You're not studying, you're just... Language Learning and Technology, 9(1), 80-96.

Sengupta, S. (2001). Exchanging ideas with peers in network-based classrooms: An aid or a pain? Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 103-134.

Skehan, P. (2003). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36(01), 1-14.

Son, J.-B. (2007). Learner experiences in web-based language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(1), 21 - 36.

Stepp-Greany, J. (2002). Student perceptions on language learning in a technological environment: Implications for the new millennium. Language, Learning & Technology, 6(1), 165.

Stickler, U., & Hampel, R. (2010). CyberDeutsch: Language Production and User Preferences in a Moodle Virtual Learning Environment. CALICO Journal, 28(1), 49-73.

Sullivan, N., & Pratt, E. (1996). A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom. System, 29, 491-501.

Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations. London: Little, Brown.

Thang, S. M., & Bidmeshki, L. (2010). Investigating the perceptions of UKM undergraduates towards an English for science and technology online course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 1 - 20.

Tharp, R. G. (1989). Psychocultural Variables and Constants: Effects on Teaching and Learning in Schools. American Psychologist, 44(2), 349-359.

Tschirner, E. (2001). Language acquisition in the classroom: The role of digital video. CALL, 14(1), 305 - 319.

Tuckman, B. W. (1999). Conducting educational research (5th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

Vygotsky, L. S., & Kozulin, A. (1986). Thought and language (Translation newly rev. and edited ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.

Wong, J. K.-K. (2004). Are the learning styles of Asian international students culturally or contextually based? International Education Journal, 4(4), 154 - 166.

Yang, S. C. (2001). Language Learning on the World Wide Web: An Investigation of EFL Learners Attitudes and Perceptions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24(2), 155 - 181.

Young, S., Cantrell, P. P., & Shaw, D. G. (2001). Online instruction: New roles for teachers and students. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 5(4), 11-16.

Yudko, E., Hirokawa, R., & Chi, R. (2008). Attitudes, beliefs, and attendance in a hybrid course. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1217-1227.

How to Cite

[Reprint] Pedagogical Lessons from Students’ Participation in Web 2.0. (2026). Journal of Technology Innovation and Learning Advancement, 1(1), Article 21. https://researcherpubs.com/index.php/tila/article/view/21
Received: 02-01-2026
Accepted: 02-01-2026
Published: 03-01-2026

Published:

03-01-2026

Issue

Section

Empirical Research Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.